You're about to lose $500,000, and you have no idea it's happening.

Right now, someone on your legal team is updating their LinkedIn profile. Your top deputy GC just took a recruiter call during lunch. That senior counsel who gave you high marks on the engagement survey? They're scheduling interviews.

Here's what makes this terrifying: 46% of in-house legal professionals are actively job searching right now, including attorneys who report being satisfied, fairly compensated, and not complaining. Your metrics say everything is fine. Your instincts agree.

The data tells a different story.

Every time a member of your in-house team walks out the door, you're not just replacing a person. You're absorbing six to twelve months of reduced team effectiveness, lost institutional knowledge that took years to build, disrupted relationships with business stakeholders who trusted that attorney, and decreased morale as remaining team members scramble to cover the gaps.

So what's driving satisfied lawyers out the door? It's not compensation; nearly all report feeling fairly paid. It's not dissatisfaction with leadership or culture. And it's certainly not a lack of interesting work.

The answer surprised even us. Legal departments that partner with alternative legal service providers (ALSPs) experience 50% less talent turnover.

Why? Because ALSPs solve the core problem: They provide flexible capacity exactly when pressure peaks without the overhead, delay, or long-term commitments that come with traditional hiring.

💡Explore why legal leaders say ALSPs are the X-factor for retaining top in-house legal talent 

The Perfect Storm No One Saw Coming

Our latest research—the 2026 Axiom Global In-House Talent Study surveying 544 in-house legal professionals across eight countries—exposes a troubling disconnect. While 80% report high job satisfaction and nearly all feel fairly compensated, the reality beneath the surface tells a different story.

Legal departments are facing unprecedented challenges from every direction:

• 97% struggle to hire great talent when positions do open up
• 95% find it difficult to staff multidisciplinary projects that increasingly define modern legal work
• 77% report both workload and complexity rising simultaneously

Even more telling: only a third of departments describe themselves as understaffed. The real problem isn't headcount; it's having the wrong mix of talent for today's demands. Teams are staffed, but not with the flexibility, specialization, or bandwidth needed to handle what's actually coming through the door.

The result? Professionals experiencing the highest pressure levels are 10 times more likely to be actively job searching. And here's the kicker: 56% of those considering a move would choose law firms over other in-house positions. In-house legal has become as demanding as private practice—without always providing the resources to succeed.

FIGURE 1

Add a sentence or headline here introducing the graph if desired.

Explore More Insights

The Legal Team Retention Solution Hiding in Plain Sight

Legal teams using ALSPs report only 14% of team members are actively job hunting, compared to 28% without ALSP support. That's not a marginal improvement—it's a fundamental transformation in retention outcomes.

Why the dramatic difference? These teams are measurably happier and under less pressure. They also show 64% fully engaged employees compared to just 46% in teams without ALSP support.

What Makes ALSPs the Retention Game-Changer?

Over half of organizations now depend on ALSPs to manage in-house team workloads, rating them the most effective resource solution available—more effective than hiring additional staff, using law firms, or bringing in contract lawyers through staffing agencies.

The effectiveness stems from four critical capabilities:

1. Elasticity: Scale up for peaks without long-term commitments, then scale back down without the painful decisions around permanent headcount.
2. Immediate multidisciplinary expertise: Access specialists across legal practice areas exactly when complex projects demand them, without waiting months for recruitment.
3. Cost efficiency: Capture 50-70% better value per dollar spent, freeing budget for strategic initiatives rather than just keeping the lights on.
4. Pressure relief: Handle overflow work without burning out your core team—the professionals you can't afford to lose.

Modern ALSPs combine senior talent with AI-enabled solutions, allowing teams to expand capabilities without the overhead of permanent headcount. It's not just about filling gaps—it's about building the flexible infrastructure that makes sustainable performance possible.

The Real Cost of Doing Nothing

That $500,000 turnover cost isn’t just recruitment and onboarding. Here's what GCs are actually paying for:

• 6-12 months of reduced team effectiveness as knowledge gaps emerge
• Lost institutional knowledge that can't be replaced
• Disrupted relationships with business stakeholders
• Decreased morale among remaining team members who absorb the workload

And if turnover becomes a pattern? Those costs compound annually.

Compare that to strategic ALSP partnerships, which transform the economics entirely. Instead of repeatedly absorbing half-million-dollar turnover costs, you're building flexible infrastructure that prevents the exodus in the first place.

You gain immediate access to senior-level expertise exactly when complex projects demand it. You deploy AI-enabled solutions that amplify your team's output without expanding headcount. And when you do need to hire permanently, you're converting proven talent rather than gambling on candidates you've interviewed for only two hours.

💡 Sustainable teams grow from systems designed to preserve knowledge and retain key people. 

The Traditional Metrics Are Lying to You

Perhaps the most important finding in our research is that satisfaction and compensation are poor predictors of retention. More than 80% of your team can report high satisfaction while simultaneously updating their LinkedIn profiles and taking recruiter calls.

The real indicator? Workload pressure. Professionals under the highest pressure are 10 times more likely to be actively seeking new jobs. Even happy lawyers leave when workloads become unmanageable.

The solution isn't throwing more money at the problem or conducting another engagement survey. It's building strategic partnerships that combine flexibility, specialized expertise, and AI-enabled support to keep teams engaged, effective, and future-ready.

Get the Full Story

The 2026 Axiom Global In-House Talent Study offers comprehensive benchmarking data and actionable insights for legal and business leaders seeking to build sustainable, high-performing departments. Our survey of 544 in-house legal professionals across eight countries and organizations with annual revenue ranging from $100 million to over $50 billion reveals exactly what's driving the retention crisis—and the proven strategies that are mitigating the fallout.

Download the report teaser to discover:

• Detailed breakdowns of pressure sources across different department sizes and industries
• The surprising correlation between project complexity and retention risk
• Why 56% of departing in-house counsel are choosing law firms over other corporate roles
• Specific ALSP engagement models that deliver the strongest retention outcomes
• Benchmarking data to assess your department's flight risk

The retention crisis won't solve itself. But with the right data and the right partnerships, you can transform your department from one where talent merely survives to one where professionals genuinely thrive.