From DGC to GC: Climbing the Last Rung of the Legal Ladder
March 2023
Posted by
Susan Jacobson
The Deputy General Counsel position is an important one, for many reasons, but chief among them is because its current occupants represent the next generation of legal leadership. So Axiom set out to examine the career satisfaction of the current crop of DGCs.
The DGC position is a hard role, and the current economic climate certainly isn’t helping. All survey respondents (100%) report feeling stressed or burned out in their current role—including 51% who feel very or extremely stressed or burned out.
That statistic is leading to turnover. Nearly a quarter (22%) of DGCs are actively searching for a new position—and even among those not actively searching, nearly two-thirds (65%) say they’re likely to look within the next year.
Where, or rather what, are they looking for in terms of a new position? Most want to continue what they are doing, just in another setting. Fifty-four percent of DGCs are seeking another DGC role in a different in-house department. In fact, most respondents envision being a DGC for an average of six more years. Others are looking to ascend the ladder in a more accelerated fashion and will be seeking a GC position sooner (37%).
But make no mistake – even if they’re content as a DGC for now, career advancement is a priority. Among the reasons many DGCs are dissatisfied with their current role is what they perceive to be its negative impact on their career progression. Nearly nine in ten (86%) say there are undesirable attributes about their current position. More than two-thirds of DGCs (67%) say limited professional development, advancement opportunities, or lack of a clear career path are the main cause of their dissatisfaction.
As a result, nearly three-quarters of DGCs (73%) feel they’ll need to change employers to advance their careers. There are two major reasons why DGCs would need to leave their employer in order to advance. Either the desired GC seat is already occupied, or they do not believe they are gaining the necessary skills to have a GC-worthy resume. The latter is a clear concern to respondents.
DGCs’ reasons for moving on reflect a simple disconnect between their current role and what it takes to move up. Overall, 96% cite issues with their current position that could negatively impact their career progression. For example, while nearly half (49%) believe they’ll need exposure to the C-suite, including working with senior executives on finance matters and strategic initiatives to advance to a GC position, 71% of those who see the importance of this opportunity say their current position doesn’t offer it. Another 42% say their current position doesn’t provide substantive management experience (such as leadership or cross-functional management of non-lawyers)—something that 39% believe will be required to advance to a GC position.
Despite not having as many opportunities as they feel they’ll need to progress, all DGCs (100%) have gained at least some professional development skills and opportunities in their current position that they’re looking to utilize as they move forward. For the professional development skills and opportunities received in their present role, most say it is because their department or organization ensures access to these for the highest performing lawyers (33%), or they proactively requested relevant professional development opportunities (29%). The fact that these DGCs received these opportunities either by proving their performance or by seeking them out proactively highlights both their skills as well as their ambition.
What Some DGCs Want: A Modern Career Path
When DGCs find their job lacking, they aren’t afraid to sound off. In addition to the career pathing problems cited, many DGCs point to quality-of-life attributes they feel are lacking in the current position: 40% cite limited or no remote work opportunities, more than a quarter cite poor company culture (27%), and 26% cite poor work/life balance (26%) as major reasons behind their diminished satisfaction.
Perhaps that’s why so many DGCs (51%) would look to a flexible talent provider or virtual law firm as a next potential home. Such a role would not only provide them with more of the skill sets they seek for ultimate progression up the legal ladder, but it would also provide a way to address the work environment and work-life balance concerns many are currently experiencing.
To work with over 14,000+ highly experienced lawyers doing exciting work at innovative companies, apply to join our network.
Posted by Susan Jacobson
Susan Jacobson serves as Senior Client Advisor for Axiom. She was formerly General Counsel at Paylocity and Deputy General Counsel of Cardinal Health.
Related Content
The Insourcing Revolution Is Here. And It’s Bigger Than Anyone Expected.
In-house legal teams are insourcing more work than ever, fueled by AI. Axiom's Chief AI and Talent Officer explains why 'possible' isn't 'sustainable.'
How the Top Seven Percent of Legal Teams Prove AI ROI
100% of legal teams are increasing AI spend, but only 7% can prove ROI. Learn the strategies top-performing legal teams use to scale AI successfully.
AI-Generated Marketing Content Compliance: A Checklist for Legal Teams
Learn how legal teams can streamline AI marketing compliance with a practical checklist for risk, review workflows, disclosures, governance and AI use.
Washington My Health My Data Act & Other Privacy Frameworks
Learn how Washington's My Health My Data Act compares with HIPAA and state privacy laws, who must comply, and what businesses need to do.
5 Forces Reshaping the Legal World Gradually, Then Suddenly
Five converging forces are reshaping the legal market—from AI and capital investment to rising costs and buyer power. GCs now have the upper hand.
How to Implement Legal AI: 5 Principles for In-House Teams
Discover five proven principles for successful legal AI adoption and implementation, from training and governance to pilots, measurement and human oversight.
What Is Shadow AI? The Growing Risk Inside Legal Departments
Learn what shadow AI is, why it puts legal departments at risk, and how to govern AI with clear policies, approved tools, training, and oversight today.
How AI-Enabled Legal Teams Are Transforming M&A Due Diligence and Contract Review
Discover how AI-enabled legal teams accelerate M&A due diligence and contract review while combining legal expertise with AI for faster, smarter results.
APAC Regulatory Fragmentation in 2026: What In-House Legal Teams Need to Know
APAC regulations are diverging fast. Learn how in-house legal teams can prioritize compliance, manage risk, and adapt to evolving rules.
AI Privacy Risks: What Legal Teams Need to Know Before Employees Use Public AI Tools
Legal teams face growing AI privacy risks. Learn how public AI tools can expose sensitive data, impact privilege, and create compliance challenges.
The Legal Profession Isn’t Ready for What's Coming: Richard Susskind's Unfiltered Take from Axiom's London Event
Richard Susskind shares a candid vision of AI's impact on law, urging legal leaders to prepare now for AGI, disruption, and transformation.
The Era of the Law Firm Panel is Ending
Law firm panels were built for a different era. Today's GCs need a dynamic portfolio of law firms, ALSPs, AI, and in-house talent to source work strategically.
Legal AI’s ROI Mirage
Legal departments are investing heavily in AI, yet most can't prove its value. Explore the ROI gap revealed in Axiom's 2026 AI report.
How Legal Departments Can Prove ROI from AI Implementation
How legal departments can measure and prove AI ROI with practical frameworks, key metrics, and strategies for turning efficiency gains into budget impact.
We Were Both Wrong About Legal AI. Here’s What Changed Our Minds.
Learn how Axiom's CTO and DraftPilot's CEO went from legal AI skeptics to believers—and the three assumptions they think most legal teams still get wrong.
What Are Export Controls? ITAR & EAR Explained
Export controls explained. Learn the differences between ITAR, EAR, and OFAC, key compliance risks, enforcement trends, and what businesses need to know.
Legal Project Management: Improve Efficiency and Control Costs
Learn how legal project management improves efficiency, controls legal costs, strengthens communication, and delivers predictable outcomes.
What Is Legal Tech? A Guide for In-House Legal Teams
A clear guide to legal tech for in-house teams—what it is, key tools, benefits, and how to implement it to boost efficiency and reduce costs.
- North America
- Must Read
- Expertise
- Legal Department Management
- Work and Career
- Perspectives
- Corporate & Commercial
- Legal Technology
- United Kingdom
- Australia
- Hong Kong
- Singapore
- State of the Legal Industry
- Technology & AI
- Central Europe
- Legal Operations
- Legal Support Professionals
- Projects
- Regulatory & Compliance
- Tech+Talent
- Data Privacy & Cybersecurity
- Talent Spotlight
- Technology
- Secondments
- Global
- Specialized Advice
- Axiom in the News
- Finance & Capital Markets
- Healthcare & Life Sciences
- Intellectual Property
- Law Firms
- Recruitment Solutions
- Cost Savings
- Featured Talent Spotlight
- GC Report
- Diversified Financial Services
- Labor & Employment
- M&A & Divestitures
- Budgeting Report
- Energy
- Investment Banking
- Banking
- Construction
- Consulting
- Consumer Packaged Goods
- In-House Report
- Manufacturing
- Materials
- Pharmaceuticals
- Professional Services
- Retail
- Transportation
- AI Survey Report
- Aerospace & Defense
- Automotive
- Business Services
- Consumer Services
- DGC Report
- Education
- Food & Beverage
- Hospitality
- Insurance
- Litigation & Dispute Resolution
- Private Equity
- Public Sector
- Real Estate
- Telecom
- Utilities
- Media
- TEST TAG NAME CHANGE
Get more of our resources for legal professionals like you.
