Legally Disrupted: Technology, Digitization, and Disruption
March 2021
By
Zach Abramowitz
Recently, I had an opportunity to host Bradley Gayton, Senior Vice President and General Counsel at the Coca-Cola Company, as part of Legally Disrupted, Axiom’s series of interviews with the leaders who are moving the legal industry forward and disrupting entrenched ways of thinking and working. The response to the webinar, measured in unusually high engagement, coupled with the sheer number of individual messages we have received from attendees, suggests that technology, digitization, and disruption are attention-grabbing issues for GCs and CLOs who made up 42% of the audience. For those who have the time, I suggest listening to the entire conversation, but I thought I would highlight a few specific key takeaways.
Legal departments have struggled with technology, but signs indicate greater adoption is on the horizon
During the webinar, we discussed some of the conflicting reports about the degree of technology-adoption inside legal departments. On the one hand, Gartner predicts that technology budgets for legal departments will triple over the next three years, but Gartner also reports that 50% of GCs feel legal transformation projects have not met expectations. Gayton said that over the last three years he has seen increased receptivity from lawyers, but acknowledged that there will continue to be two types of companies, those that “lean in” to technology and those that “participate by proxy.”
Engaging with startups is about more than cost savings
Gayton, who is an active angel investor, explained that his passion for legal startups is about a lot more than cost savings:
“I recognize that we are in the midst of a digital transformation. And what excites me, in meeting entrepreneurs and exploring how technology is going to impact the practice of law, is understanding that technology is not necessarily about reducing cost. It's really about trying to find a way to reduce low-value work that lawyers are doing so we can enhance the intellectual capital that's being displaced and focus on more strategic work.”
This matches my own experience consulting with other in-house departments. Efficiency, process optimization – that is the language of ten years ago. More and more, decision makers are asking how legal startups can deliver better business outcomes and enable a better work environment for the in-house department, so that they can attract the best talent.
Is Gayton an outlier or the new normal?
I specifically pushed Gayton on this point, asking him directly whether or not he thought he was an outlier when it came to his interest and appetite for legal technology. His answer was layered:
“I'm finding more and more peers having these kinds of conversations, though we might be at different places on the maturity curve. But I do find more and more people exploring and trying to understand the space.”
Gayton’s anecdotal experience seemed to line up with the webinar’s poll results of attendees, in which nearly 50% of the mostly GC and CLO audience, said they would invest in legal startups. (Only 19% said they would NOT invest in legal startups.)
Later in our discussion, Gayton made a compelling argument that investing in legal startups sets off a chain reaction which ultimately enables him to become a more effective GC.
“My motivations for investing are not purely economic – they're not altruistic, but they're not purely economic. The process of talking with entrepreneurs, evaluating companies, and understanding the use cases gives me great insight into some of the challenges that they face. This, in turn, gives me a deeper understanding of my own digital literacy and allows me to incorporate those learnings and bring them back to the company as I imagine how I might craft a winning digital strategy for the company.”
In other words, engaging with startups and doing rigorous investor due diligence is a great way for an in-house attorney to get a better understanding of what is possible, which then helps them improve the processes of their department. If the trends that both Gayton and I are seeing track with the rest of the industry, we should begin hearing about more disruptive legal businesses gaining traction with legal departments as customers, and with individual lawyers as investors on their cap table.
For more insights from Bradley Gayton, listen to the entire conversation.
Posted by Zach Abramowitz
Related Content
How In-House Counsel Should Negotiate SaaS Contracts
Negotiate SaaS contracts smarter: key clauses, AI risks, liability caps, and strategies in-house counsel need to balance speed, value, and risk.
Continuous Volatility Is the New Normal: Building Corporate Legal Departments for Constant Disruption and Uncertainty
Corporate legal teams must adapt to constant global disruption by building flexible, cost-efficient resourcing models for evolving risk and demand.
Same Problem, One Fix: How a Change Management Framework Can End AI Stall and Law Firm Habit Together
Law firms and AI adoption share the same root problem: change resistance. Learn how the Beckhard-Harris model helps legal teams drive transformation.
What the Quiet Revolution Taught Us
Axiom CRO Sara Morgan on 26 years of ALSP growth: why in-house legal leaders are 3x more satisfied with alternative providers—and what comes next.
The Law Firm Reflex Is Costing You Millions
Axiom CRO Sara Morgan: 61% of legal departments default to law firms when workload spikes, and it's costing them millions. Here's how to break the reflex.
AI Governance Framework: How Legal Teams Can Get It Right
AI governance framework guide for legal teams: risk-based AI policies, data governance, vendor safeguards & compliance best practices.
The Real Reason Legal Departments Can’t Change—And What to Do About It
New Axiom research reveals mindset—not budget—is the biggest barrier to legal transformation, and how GCs can close the knowing-doing gap.
Will AI Replace In-House Lawyers? What General Counsel Need to Know
Will AI replace lawyers? Discover how AI is transforming legal work. Learn why human judgment, business acumen, and communication matter more than ever.
What the WSJ $3,400 an Hour Story Really Means for Legal Teams
Premium firms may charge $3,400/hr, but budgets break from rising associate rates. Legal teams need elastic capacity plus AI to control spend.
Best in Class: Study Ranks Axiom #1 Across Key Performance Metrics
Axiom ranks #1 in 8 out of 9 key performance metrics for flexible legal talent providers, demonstrating unmatched expertise, coverage, and cost-effectiveness. Discover why GCs trust Axiom.
ESG Reporting: Full Guide, Standards, and Requirements
Learn what ESG reporting is, key frameworks like GRI and SASB, evolving regulations, and how to build a reporting program that delivers real business value.
Law.com: The CLOUD Act, Encryption and the US-UK Standoff in 2026
The US-UK encryption standoff has trapped tech companies between irreconcilable mandates—in-house counsel must navigate strategic risks when compliance with both jurisdictions becomes impossible.
AI Contract Management: What Legal Teams Need to Know
As legal teams face mounting pressure to do more with less, AI contract management solutions offer a compelling answer, transforming the contract process.
Why 80% of In-House Teams Are Rethinking Their Law Firm Relationships
New research reveals a legal market caught between legacy habits and transformation, with significant implications for how legal work gets done.
State Privacy Laws: 2026 Changes & Compliance
Navigate 2026 state privacy law changes across 15 states. Learn compliance requirements for Indiana, Kentucky, Rhode Island & key CCPA updates.
Why Axiom Outperforms LPO on Quality, Flexibility, and Business Impact
While LPO can solve some problems, it frequently creates new ones. This is where Axiom’s model offers a fundamentally different and better approach.
Finding Professional Confidence, Personal Balance: How Axiom Empowered a Commercial Attorney's Career Transformation
Discover how Axiom empowered commercial attorney Eileen to rebuild her career and confidence while balancing single parenthood after personal tragedy.
The AI Paradox: Why Your Legal Team's Productivity Gains Are Fueling a Retention Crisis
93% of legal professionals say AI boosts productivity, yet 76% fear job loss. New research reveals how AI anxiety is driving turnover. See the new data.
- North America
- Must Read
- Expertise
- Legal Department Management
- Work and Career
- Perspectives
- State of the Legal Industry
- Legal Technology
- United Kingdom
- Australia
- Hong Kong
- Singapore
- Artificial Intelligence
- General Counsel
- Central Europe
- Legal Operations
- Solutions
- Regulatory & Compliance
- Spotlight
- Data Privacy & Cybersecurity
- Technology
- Commercial & Contract Law
- Corporate Law
- Global
- Tech+Talent
- Axiom in the News
- Large Projects
- Finance
- Law Firms
- Featured Talent Spotlight
- GC Report
- Healthcare
- Cost Savings
- Intellectual Property
- Videos
- Capital Markets
- Diversified Financial Services
- Labor & Employment
- Secondments
- Budgeting Report
- Commercial Transaction
- Energy
- Investment Banking
- Regulatory Response
- Banking
- Construction
- Consulting
- Consumer Packaged Goods
- Financial Services
- Healthcare & Life Sciences
- In-House Report
- Industrial
- Legal Support Professionals
- Manufacturing
- Materials
- Mergers and Acquisitions
- Pharmaceuticals
- Retail
- Transportation
- Aerospace & Defense
- Automotive
- Business Services
- Consumer Services
- DGC Report
- Education
- Food And Beverage
- Hospitality
- Insurance
- Litigation
- Private Equity
- Professional Services
- Public Sector
- Real Estate
- Specialized Advice
- Telecom
- Utilities
- News
- Recruitment Solutions
Get more of our resources for legal professionals like you.